Posts Tagged ‘transport’

1.1.6

Plain English Version

Connectivity – Birmingham has problems that it must solve, especially making places accessibile to all, travel around the city cente, digital (computer and other technology) connectivity and its transport and other links with other cities such as London.

Original Document

Connectivity – Birmingham must address critical issues, including accessibility, internal mobility, digital connectivity and connections and its relationships with London and other major centres of population and business.


2.1.10

Plain English Version

Making transport a priority

The plan will suggest creating a nice and safe network of city streets and investing in public transport networks and services. These might include making the Metro bigger, new fast buses, improving normal bus services and a system to manage traffic, parking and streets. This report has choices for these transport priorities. It also asks for ideas to expand digital and communications technologies (such as phones and computers).

Original Document

PRIORITISING TRANSPORT

The plan will propose transport priorities which will include the creation of an attractive and safe network of city streets and investment in public transport networks and services. These might include extensions to the existing and currently proposed Metro services, new bus-based rapid transport (BRT) services, enhancements to the conventional bus services and a dynamic traffic, parking and street management system. This report contains options for these transport priorities. It also seeks ideas for the expansion of digital and communications technologies.


2.1.11

Plain English Version

The first and best way is to make sure that buildings, spaces, land uses and transport work well together, and that we use technology (such as email, web meetings and using computers to work from home) to cut the need to travel.

Original Document

The first and most effective method will be to ensure that buildings, spaces, land uses and movement networks are arranged in a complementary manner, and that opportunities for digital media communication are further exploited, since these are the best ways of reducing the need to travel by less sustainable modes.


2.1.9 Expanding the Central Area

Plain English Version

To raise the city’s profile, several things need to happen. The plan must offer chances for high-quality offices and shops in the central area to expand and for the city to carry on holding important international events in modern, high-quality venues. It must also allow for culture to develop, including the idea of using the city itself as a gallery; for the city’s academic and research profile to be raised; and for businesses and specialist activites to be set up and developed. It must also do something that is not so easy to plan for, which is aim to create or increase the things that make the city interesting, exciting and varied. So the central area will spread out, and there will be an area around it that will have a mixture of city centre and more local activities, shown on Figure 5.2. The questions later on in this report ask you what you think we can do in the city centre to let us achieve these goals:

  • one of the most important cities in the world for business and high value commercial operations
  • important in arts and culture
  • a leader in making and using digital technology
  • a source of research, development and new enterprise from our universities
  • a profitable and growing environment for new high technology and green industries
  • famous for its entertainment and leisure facilities
  • shopping and town centre services and surroundings that are suitable for one of the most important cities in the world
  • the right conditions to develop creative and fringe activities
  • very good open spaces and public places (such as parks and squares)
  • nice city centre surroundings where a variety of people live, especially families
  • a city that is easy to get to and around with good transport and stations and that is good for telecommunications (such as phones, internet and cable services)

Original Document

To raise the city’s status, a number of factors need to come together. plan will need to provide opportunities for central area uses such as prime offices and shops to expand and for the city to continue to stage high level international events in modern, quality facilities. It will need to create the right conditions for the further development of the cultural assets of the city including developing the concept of the city itself as a gallery; the raising of the city’s academic and research profile; and for starting and growing central area businesses and niche, specialist activities. Less easily planned for, it must aim to create or foster the conditions that add human interest, excitement and diversity to the city. The central area will therefore expand further out of the core, and there will be a transition zone outside this area which will contain a mixture of city centre and more local activities, shown on Figure 5. 2. questions in the later sections of this report ask what can be done in the city centre to enable to realise the following ambitions as a global city:

  • A world player in business and high value commercial operations
  • A big international presence in arts and culture
  • A leader in the development and application of digital technology
  • A major seed bed for spin-off research, development and new enterprise from the universities
  • A profitable and growth-oriented environment for clusters of emerging high technology and green industries
  • A famed range of entertainment and leisure facilities
  • Shopping and town centre services and environment commensurate with global city status
  • supportive conditions for the strong development of creative and fringe use and activities
  • Outstanding open spaces and public places
  • An attractive city centre living environment for a diverse range of residents, especially families
  • Outstanding accessibility, both physical and virtual, through high quality sustainable transport and user-friendly transport interchanges and high speed next generation telecommunication


3.7.8

Plain English Version

The view of the city centre varies depending on where you are in the city. It looks impressive where there are landmarks, such as the BT Tower, Beetham Tower and the Rotunda, rising above other large buildings. This happens with the distant views from the M6 motorway; indeed, we could say that Birmingham is in the best place of any UK city in having a dramatic view close to a main national transport route. There are other good views from several places including the entrance to the city along the Aston Expressway and more close-up views in Highgate and Digbeth. The night time views of tall lit-up buildings are impressive when you enter Navigation Street from the back exit of New Street Station. On the other hand, entering the city by rail gives a poor view of the city – although Eastside will try and change this – and it is not impressive for people arriving at the station and catching taxis.

Original Document

The city centre’s visual image and presence varies depending on the viewpoint. The image is at its most impressive where the centre displays a strong baseline of large buildings above which rise a number of landmarks, such as the BT Tower, the Beetham Tower and the Rotunda. This is particularly the case in distant views from the M6 Motorway; indeed, Birmingham is arguably in the best position of any UK city in having a dramatic presence close to a major national transport route. Other significant images are gained from several locations including the approach along the Aston Expressway and in nearer views such as from Highgate and Digbeth. Night time views of tall illuminated buildings are especially impressive on emerging into Navigation Street from the rear exit of New Street Station. On the other hand, the rail approach into New Street Station gives a poor image of the city – although the Eastside proposals will go some way to change this – and the taxi arrival experience from the station is unimpressive.


3.8.2

Plain English Version

A lot of Birmingham’s canals are currently hidden from view. Parts of the network have been  improved over recent years, at the Mailbox, Gas Street Basin and Brindley Place, but some other parts are unattractive and do not feel secure.

The canals could attract more people and activities and act as a safe alternative way to get around the city cenre (by walking or cycling alongside).

Original Document

Birmingham’s canal network is an important part of the city’s historic legacy. But much of the canal network is currently hidden from view. Parts of the network have been substantially improved over recent years, most notably at the Mailbox, Gas Street Basin and Brindleyplace, but other parts are unattractive and do not feel secure. The canal network has the potential to attract more people and activities and act as a safe alternative movement network, whilst maintaining the industrial character.


4.1.2

Plain English Version

Birmingham has a tradition of  making it easy for people to get around in cars and that means the city is tricky for walking and cycling.   Even though the city centre is compact it’s difficlut to walk.  Cyclists also have problems. Some of their key cycle lanes are cut off by roads or railways.  Yes we’ve improved things in recent years but still we need to work much harder to make the city good for cycling or walking.

Original Document

This historic emphasis in Birmingham on enabling and accommodating movement by private vehicles has led to an urban form that is not conducive to movement by other means. For pedestrians, this means that, although the city centre is relatively compact, conditions for walking are adversely affected by numerous physical barriers and the disconnection of different parts of the central area, and some areas have poor public realm and legibility. For cyclists, dis-incentives include poor provision of cycle lanes and facilities, the severance of cycling networks by major highway and railway corridors and road danger. So although improvements have been made over recent years for both pedestrians and cyclists, much more is needed if walking and cycling are to become genuinely attractive modes of transport in the city centre.


4.1.6

Plain English Version

The Council has developed a new transport model for the city centre. A database was created in 2004 after detailed land use surveys and we have produced forecasts for 2011, 2021 and 2031 to show possible changes in the transport that is needed. These took into account future levels of population, housing, employment and other activities. We will prepare the Big City Plan together with transport modelling, and will come up with the ways we can improve the transport network for the city centre.

Original Document

The Council has developed a new transportation model for the city centre. Detailed land use surveys have established a 2004 database and scenarios have been produced for 2011, 2021 and 2031 to identify possible changes in transport demand. This has considered future levels of population, housing, employment and other activities. The preparation of the Big City Plan will interact with transport modelling, and in combination will establish required infrastructure improvements for the city centre.


4.6

Plain English Version

Centro have worked with Birmingham City Council and come up with four metro routes that will lead out from the city centre:

  • The existing Line 1 running between Snow Hill and Wolverhampton
  • The planned Line 1 extension leading through the city centre to New Street Station then heading along Broad Street to end at Edgbaston and later at Junction 3 of the M5.
  • A route to Birmingham International Airport extension running along Digbeth High Street

Key (Popup full image)

Centro has got hold of a Transport Works Act Order, which allows them to carry on with the extension of Line 1 along Bull Street, Corporation Street, through Victoria Square to Broad Street. This option would need us to remove the buses from Corporation Street in favour of the tram, but would not allow us to fully pedestrianise it. Centro thinks that doing this would mean that a lot more people would use Line1 because it creates a direct Metro link to the New Street Gateway. To pick up further routes, they suggest a one-way city centre loop to serve Southside, Eastside and Westside. (See Figure 4.1 for alternative metro routes)

Figure 4.1 shows the suggested future metro network developed by Centro in partnership with Birmingham City Council. As well as the Line1 extension mentioned above, a one-way city core loop is suggested serving the Eastside, Southside and Westside districts. The route, which runs around the south of the Bull Ring and immediately north of the international markets, will mean a lot more people can use the trams and will improve public transport in these areas. This loop would be needed to have the airport extension from Digbeth High Street. A further extension is planned out to Great Barr via New Town Row. The image also shows a route along Sherlock Street which would infill a route to the south.

Proposed Metro Routes (Popup full image)

For some routes, we could have ‘Bus Rapid Transit’ (BRT) instead of the Metro. Many modern cities have seen the benefits of trams in terms of transport and regeneration, setting them up is expensive and there are other practical issues. They can also affect other modes of transport (such as pedestrians in crowded streets). Bus Rapid Transport is halfway between buses and trams, with optional features such as better vehicles, priority through guideways, and not as many stops as normal buses. BRT may be a cheaper alternative to trams in some places and along some routes. Centro have suggested routes to Bartley Green, Chelmsley Wood and (as a pre-metro) to Perry Barr.

Original Document

Centro, in partnership with Birmingham City Council, has identified four metro routes that will radiate from the city centre:

  • The existing Line 1 running between Snow Hill and Wolverhampton.
  • The planned Line 1 extension heading through the city centre to New Street Station then heading along Broad Street to terminate at Edgbaston and later at Junction 3 of the M5.
  • A route to Birmingham International Airport extension running along Digbeth High Street.
  • A route to Great Barr, using the alignment of New Town Row.

Centro has obtained a Transport Works Act Order, enabling them to progress with the extension of Line 1 along Bull Street, Corporation Street, through Victoria Square to Broad Street. This option would require the removal of buses from Corporation Street in favour of the tram, but would not permit its full pedestrianisation. Centro predicts that this alignment will lead to major increases in Line1 patronage simply through creating a direct Metro link to the New Street Gateway. To pick up further routes a one-way city centre loop is proposed to serve Southside, Eastside and Westside. (See Figure 4.1 for alternative metro routes)

Figure 4.1 shows the proposed future metro network developed by Centro in partnership with BCC. As well as the Line 1 extension referred to above, a one-way city core loop is proposed serving Eastside, Southside and Westside quarters. The route, running around the south of the Bull Ring and immediately north of the international markets, will greatly improve tram system capacity and improve public transport accessibility in these areas. This loop would be required to deliver the airport extension from Digbeth High Street. A further extension is planned out to Great Barr via New Town Row. A route along Sherlock Street is also shown, which would infill a route to the south.

Proposed Metro Routes (Popup full image)

An alternative to Metro for some routes would be to implement ‘Bus Rapid Transit’. While the transport and regeneration benefits of trams are well understood in many modern cities, the costs and practical issues surrounding their implementation are considerable, while they can have adverse impacts on other modes (e.g. on pedestrians in crowded streets). Bus Rapid Transit is an intermediate mode between buses and trams, with optional features such as better vehicles, enhanced priority through guideways, and less frequent stops than conventional buses. BRT may be a more cost-effective alternative to tram in certain locations/corridors. Centro have suggested routes to Bartley Green, Chelmsley Wood and (as a pre-metro) to Perry Barr.


4.8.1

Plain English Version

Birmingham could be the UK’s best city for walking. It’s often the quickest way to get around, especially when you can walk from one side of the city centre to the other in under 20 minutes. However the routes can be poorly signed and difficult or unpleasant to use, something we need to change.

Original Document

Birmingham has the potential to have the UK’s most walkable big city centre. Many cross-centre trips are achievable on foot within 15-20 minutes, making walking the quickest door-to-door option. However, the quality, directness and ease of understanding of the routes involved often leave a lot to be desired. New and improved crossings, better information, greater levels of pedestrian priority in key locations and the removal of key barriers all need to form part of the picture.


4.9.1

Plain English Version

Cycling is going to become more important as there are more journeys around the city centre.  At the moment though Birmingham city centre can be hostile to cyclists. We need to put real effort into changing this.

Original Document

Cycling has an important role to play in providing for future movement demands generated by city centre growth. Yet present conditions for cycling are often hostile, due to vehicle dominated streets and a shortage of cycling facilities or direct routes to and from key destinations. A concerted effort is required to improve conditions for cyclists through changing the behaviour of vehicles, removing major physical barriers and the provision of improved ‘end to end’ cycling facilities.


4.9.2

Plain English Version

We already have some cycle paths, but separate paths are difficult to create in a packed city centre, so we need to think of other ways of making cycling safe and easy.   One way is to link together a series of streets designed to slow down cars and vans and  be safer for people on bikes. We can also add cycle parking into more areas, with some including  shower facilities. This will need to part of the Parking Strategy.

Original Document

The city already has a set of core cycling routes, but segregated paths are difficult to create in a dense urban area so the issue is what other improvements can be made to develop a comprehensive network of continuous, safe routes. One approach is to develop a connected network of cycle-friendly streets with an emphasis on reducing traffic speeds and road danger on those streets. In addition, public realm improvements and street upgrades could give cycling a higher priority, with cycle parking as an integral feature. New development should provide safe and secure cycle parking and should include suitable shower facilities. Cycle parking requirements will be included in the Parking Strategy.


Connected city

Plain English Version

We think that Birmingham should support the idea of a high-speed rail network to the city centre.

Original Document

Birmingham should actively promote the development of the high-speed rail network to the city centre.


Move local

Plain English Version

We need to think about the choices for running the Metro, bus routes and walking routes so that the city centre is easy to get around by public transport and also that there is enough space for pedestrians.

Original Document

Options for the running of the Metro, bus routes and walking routes need to be considered, so that the city centre is both accessible by public transport and space is freed up for pedestrians.


Question CON10

Plain English Version

What should we do to make the bus system better? Think about quality, reliability, safety, comfort, image and fuel efficiency/environmental performance.

Should we be using more buses or less, should we look at using more of other types of transport?

What streets should buses use, where should they stop in the city centre and where should they link with other modes of transport (train, metro, cars, taxis)?

Original Document

How should we go about developing a genuinely 21st century bus system, in terms of quality, reliability, safety, comfort, image and fuel efficiency/environmental performance? What is the future role of the bus in the city centre relative to other public transport options? What streets should buses use, where should they stop in the city centre and where should they interchange with other modes of transport?


Question CON11

Plain English Version

How can we make the City Centre the easiest to walk around in the UK?

What streets and spaces should be our top priority to make good walking routes?

Where do we need to do things, such as barrier removal and crossing improvement?

What other kinds of improvement might be carried out?

Original Document

How can we go about making the city centre the UK’s most walkable centre? What streets and spaces should be the top priority walking routes? Where does attention need to be targeted to improve walkability, such as barrier removal and crossing improvement? What other kinds of improvement might be carried out?


Question CON7

Plain English Version

How can we make more use of rail to transport workers and others into the city centre, up to and after the year 2025, and what transport network projects will we need to support this? Can and should the Big City Plan prepare for a future High Speed Train route to the city centre and facilities for people getting off.

Original Document

How can rail play a stronger role in providing for commuter and other travel needs into the city centre, up to and beyond 2025, and what infrastructure projects will be needed to support this? Can and should the Big City Plan provide appropriate protection for a future High Speed Train route to the city centre and related disembarkation facilities?


Smart city

Plain English Version

We think that Birmingham must be one of the best cities at finding ways to become better and richer, while at the same time causing less damage to the environment. This is called ‘smart growth‘. This means finding new ways to cut carbon produced by transport; to manage electricity and gas in buildings; to make good use of water; and to create as little waste as possible.

Original Document

Birmingham must lead the field on achieving smart growth. This means finding new ways to reduce transport carbon; to manage energy in buildings; to make good use of water; and to minimise waste.


Street local

Plain English Version

We think that Birmingham needs a plan that deals with all types of routes from the biggest to the smallest. This plan will make the most of the good access provided by the outer ring road and other main roads, as well as making sure that we link up new and existing places well with smaller roads.

Original Document

Birmingham needs a strategy that deals with all types of routes from the biggest to the smallest. This will make the most of the good access that the outer ring road and other strategic routes provides, whilst ensuring that at a local scale high quality connections are provided to link new and existing spaces.